Wondering what to make of the Cash for Clunkers initiative that’s been sweeping the news ranks and has just been extended by Congress with another $2B to total $3B?
Green Builder Media’s most recent newsletter thinks that it’s a step in the right direction but should be accompanied by numerous other wholistic initiatives in parallel to drive systemic change, rather than just a one-time band-aid. The program is expected to replace 500K cars by Fall 2009 when the funds are expected to dry up again, and to increase the efficiency of participating drivers by 60% (average 10 MPG for cars traded in).
Of course with many green-intended initiatives there’s a downside, and many environmentalists point to the energy required to deal with the old cars as a major offset to the program’s benefits.
I see GBM’s point. Several months ago Click and Clack (the Car Guys) raised a concept of a wholesale transformation of Detroit and the US auto industry, driven by a government-backed initiative to improve railroads and rail transportation. If the government feels the need to protect US workers and has the drive and vision to protect the environment at the same time, why not cause real long term change? By letting some of these auto manufacturers, who have shown scant innovation in recent decades, go under, and use the labor, capital and equipment to build up our railroads instead?










San Francisco is close to enacting some of the strictest green building codes in the nation. Last week, the city’s Building Inspection Commission voted to pass the revisions to its building code onto the city’s Board of Supervisors. Mayor Gavin Newsom, who established a task force last year to come up with these revisions, has promised to sign the regulations into law.

COMMENTS