Although intuitively it would make sense that green buildings are better investments than normal buildings, until now there has not been a lot of data that back this up. The Co-Star Group recently released a report (download here) that analyzed approximately 1,300 LEED and Energy Star buildings. The verdict? Both types of buildings significantly outperform their non-LEED and Energy Star counterparts.
For example, on average LEED buildings sell for $171 more per square foot, while Energy Star buildings sell for $61 more per square foot. Similarly LEED buildings rent for more than $11.25 per square foot while Energy Star buildings rent for more than $2.38 per square foot. Both have an approximately 4% higher occupancy rate than regular buildings. The report also stated that Energy Star buildings had 10-20% lower operating costs compared to regular buildings (it did not offer a similar analysis for LEED buildings).
The report doesn't offer reasons for this difference, but it's reasonable to infer that there is a greater demand from consumers for these buildings and they are in relatively short supply. While LEED is by no means perfect, it's encouraging to know that there are measurable economic benefits to achieving LEED certification.













Surprise surprise, reforestation begins at home--and it can even save you money.
This object may look like a bit of light sculpture you'd pick up at Ikea, but it's actually an energy-saving device. According to
If you're building a new home, upgrading to 
COMMENTS